Volume 2, No. 8, August 2001

 

Europe Pushes Out the US from UNHRC and INCB

 

Two days after the US president announced his missile defence programme on May 1st the US lost its bid to retain its seats in two important UN institutions namely, The UN Human Rights Commission and the International Narcotics Control Bureau. In the UNHRC France Austria and Sweden edged out the US garnering more votes than the US out of a total of 53 member countries. In the INCB the US was voted out and six other countries, including Iran and India, were elected. In both the institutions the voting was secret compounding the US exasperation as it became difficult to know who voted whom. The US State Department was stunned by the results as more than 43 countries had pledged to vote for the US candidate in the UNHRC but it could only get 29. All the three elected candidates were from Europe with France (52), Austria (41) and Sweden (32) outdoing the US.

The US officials are down discussing the vote results in these UN bodies. Unofficially, they are blaming the European countries for working clandestinely against the US. Twice bitten, the US is out to take revenge on the UN. The US Senate has withheld hundreds of millions of dollars it owed to the UN to punish it for daring to ‘disturb the Lion’. The UN Secretary General Kofi Annan consoled the US leaders by saying that he understood their "frustration, surprise and shock" at being not elected to the UN bodies.

The US had been in these organisations ever since their inception. In fact it had been the architect of these institutions and had been utilising its clout to intimidate and impose sanctions on others. The case of Iraq is for everyone to see where more than a million people have died due to the unwarranted sanctions. Here is an account by Mr. Denis Halliday, the UN’s Chief Relief Coordinator in Iraq, where he supervised the "oil-for-food" program. Halliday resigned all his UN posts, including his position as Assistant Secretary General, in protest of the brutal toll the sanctions are exacting on the people of Iraq.

"There’s not a sense of mass death; it’s not a massacre, it’s not a thing we’ve seen in other parts of the world. It’s just every day. And every day people are dying all over the country, in isolation—not in groups, in isolation. A baby here, a baby there, a child here, an elderly...so it’s hard to get a tangible feel for it, but it pervades the whole country and the attitude and the feeling of the Iraqi people.

I think it’s a program of genocide. I just don’t have a better word."

The sanctions were imposed because the US wanted to isolate Iraq and punish its people, as they had not heeded the US call to overthrow Saddam Hussain’s regime. A million people die and no nation comes forward to say: ‘put the US on trial for its inhuman crimes, its crimes against humanity.’ It funded the Contra rebels of Nicaragua with the narcotic and drug money but no nation raised a point to accuse the US rulers of trading in drugs and using the money for illegal and unconstitutional activities against other nations. It used the pretext of drug trade to arm and impart military training to the reactionary governments of Peru, Columbia and Panama to crush the revolutionary and anti-state struggles there, or, to change the governments even by directly intervening militarily in many countries. All these years the US has imposed its will on others. Now we see it being "kicked out" of the institutions it had been using so wantonly. What the European
nations are upto? Thinking of replacing the US? Most probably. No doubt, the US earned the ire of the people worldwide. No doubt, many governments in the world resent the US over-lording and high-handedness. Pushing out the US is an indicator as to this.

The Secretary General of the UN talks apologetically when he expresses his wish that the US would again get his seat the next time the election is held. The US defeat, he seems to regret, has come due to the "number game" of votes because in an election you cannot tell "how the people will vote" and "one has to respect the verdict of a democratic election". He conveys the point that punishing the US was not on the agenda and it was just a game of numbers. But the US knows it well. And when the most ardent of advocates of democracy and democratic values in the world is pushed out through elections its Senate refuses to clear its dues. The country that teaches others to abide by democratic values is out to take revenge on a "democratic decision".

A few days before the vote in the UN agencies the US pulled itself out of the Kyoto Protocol to defy bindings on the emission of Green House Gases (GHGs). The US is the biggest culprit in the world who pollutes the environment with GHGs and contributes to the depletion of Ozone layer leading to global warming but it refuses to take responsibility and make changes accordingly.

The finance ministers of the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Europe have accused the Bush administration of "undermining co-operation against global problems." The newspapers have reported that there was a "collective outrage" against the US for quitting the Kyoto protocol which sets the targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Though the EU and the US are united when they come to deal with the oppressed and backward countries the differences between them are increasing.

<Top>

 

Home  |  Current Issue  |  Archives  |  Revolutionary Publications  |  Links  |  Subscription